Essays

The therapist who stays silent loses the room - AI in Mental Health

AI in mental health is no longer a future debate. It's a present reality — being shaped right now, with or without the people who matter most.

By Jona DodaFounder & CEO, Bliss2 min read
Share

Some therapists are refusing to engage with AI.

I understand why. The fear is real. The concerns are legitimate. The history of tech overpromising in healthcare is long, and the stakes in mental health are higher than almost anywhere else.

But silence isn't protection.

What's already happening

Right now, AI mental health tools are being built, with or without therapists at the table. Investors are funding them. Regulators are trying to define them. Startups are deploying them. The conversation is happening at speed.

And when therapists opt out of that conversation, they don't stop it. They just lose their seat in it.

The point of no return

Here's what's no longer up for debate: AI will be used in mental health. It already is. We are past the point of return — not because it was inevitable, but because it's already here, already scaling, already reaching people who would never otherwise access support.

We can't reverse that. What we can do, what we must do, is shape it. Improve it. Make sure it's built on clinical wisdom, ethical guardrails, and genuine care for the people it serves.

That responsibility belongs to therapists more than anyone else.

The painful irony

The people most qualified to define how AI is used in mental health, the ones who understand harm, boundaries, therapeutic alliance, and what "help" actually means in a crisis, are sometimes the ones choosing not to engage.

By building that wall, they're not protecting their clients. They're handing the microphone to people who've never sat with someone in pain.

We are at a crucial moment. The norms being set today will define this field for the next decade. Every framework being written, every product being shipped, every policy being drafted, these need the voice of clinicians. Not as critics from the outside. As co-authors from within.

The most powerful thing a therapist can do right now isn't to reject AI. It's to refuse to let AI be defined without them.

Therapists in the driver's seat — that's what we're building at Bliss.

Control over AI in mental health shouldn't sit with tech companies alone. It shouldn't sit with investors. It should sit with the professionals who've dedicated their lives to understanding the human mind.

At Bliss, therapists aren't advisors or validators after the fact, they're the architects of how AI shows up for their clients. The AI works for them. Not the other way around.

If you're a therapist who wants to help shape what responsible AI in mental health actually looks like — join our waitlist.